![matthew bomer simon halls. Matt Bomer [Actor] - Page 2](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_umRjB7PYfuWacBTgyzGwhbJnBegDsNQYlCOL0AyFnNUYuXcXPwuIiLHRJEnoLvnHTEiSaOYrHt0A2gtpQ7LnUPiPQWOtQ=s0-d "Matt Bomer [Actor] - Page 2")
chi_shark
09-11 01:15 PM
Perfect! many thanks for posting that link. it looks like our dear HR5882 is light years away from being signed into law... so I just tamed my expectations... However, we definitely need to keep up those phone calls. Fair Disclosure: I have called only once or twice... Folks, I am very less motivated about this thing getting better. But I am a dedicated spectator. Please pardon me in advance for in-action.
found this excellent details and thought should share it. :)
Have also highlighted #6 where HR 5882 is currently at
http://www.vote-smart.org/resource_govt101_02.php
found this excellent details and thought should share it. :)
Have also highlighted #6 where HR 5882 is currently at
http://www.vote-smart.org/resource_govt101_02.php
wallpaper Matt Bomer [Actor] - Page 2
nixstor
01-22 06:12 PM
She cannot change to H1 until Oct 1 which is when the new quota of H1's will be available unless she is going to work for an exempt organization/company. In the latter case then she can apply directly now for H1 as long as she is still maintaining H4 status.
This is what I get from the new memo:
Immigration Policy and Procedural Memoranda (http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/PeriodsofAdm120506.pdf)
I hope this will help you.
andy
ofcourse she cannot change her status until oct 1st. How ever the sluice gates for the new h1 quota open on Apr 1st and will be gone in days. My question is Does she need her H4 approved to have her prospective employer file the I 129? (or) Can she just provide the notice of action she received for her H4 extension filing to show that she is maintaining status?
This is what I get from the new memo:
Immigration Policy and Procedural Memoranda (http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/PeriodsofAdm120506.pdf)
I hope this will help you.
andy
ofcourse she cannot change her status until oct 1st. How ever the sluice gates for the new h1 quota open on Apr 1st and will be gone in days. My question is Does she need her H4 approved to have her prospective employer file the I 129? (or) Can she just provide the notice of action she received for her H4 extension filing to show that she is maintaining status?
BECsufferer
01-07 08:36 PM
Indian companies like Satyam had been running these farce show of outsourcing for long time, and finally the reality is surfacing up. Not only did these companies run scam with their investors but also with their clients and employees.
As a client I see them initially low balling the real cost to obtain business and when the in-house engineering capabilities have been eliminated, they will start jacking up the prices. L&T did this with us and thankfully this month we are finally kicking their a$$ out of our facility. And we will do real engineering here in USA!
Couple of years ago, I ran into an indian at one of my visa renewals outside US consulate and he told me how, Satyam forged papers to have him slip into USA on L1 and than once here convert into H1 so he can finally apply and obtain GC. All these years he worked for remarkablly low wages.
Hope Satyam scamsters see life behind bars in India!
As a client I see them initially low balling the real cost to obtain business and when the in-house engineering capabilities have been eliminated, they will start jacking up the prices. L&T did this with us and thankfully this month we are finally kicking their a$$ out of our facility. And we will do real engineering here in USA!
Couple of years ago, I ran into an indian at one of my visa renewals outside US consulate and he told me how, Satyam forged papers to have him slip into USA on L1 and than once here convert into H1 so he can finally apply and obtain GC. All these years he worked for remarkablly low wages.
Hope Satyam scamsters see life behind bars in India!
2011 his jul poetry, Matt+omer
god_bless_you
05-26 12:32 PM
check these :
http://www.qando.net/details.aspx?Entry=3949
http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=22656
http://www.qando.net/details.aspx?Entry=3949
http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=22656
more...
gcformeornot
10-19 09:13 AM
There were about 600,000 AOS applications including the July and August filers. So that number less 60,000...roughly about 540,000 applications still pending with USCIS....
applications pending before July/Aug applications, why did they make all CURRENT? I don't think this number is correct. They maybe stuck in FBI Namecheck.
applications pending before July/Aug applications, why did they make all CURRENT? I don't think this number is correct. They maybe stuck in FBI Namecheck.
Winner
03-16 01:13 PM
I saw a similar thread in one of the anti-immigration forums.
It was about members of immigration voice using filthy language in public forums. Don�t remember the exact words but it read something like �is this kind of third world behavior we get by bringing in so-called HIGHLY SKILLED immigrants to USA?�
It was about members of immigration voice using filthy language in public forums. Don�t remember the exact words but it read something like �is this kind of third world behavior we get by bringing in so-called HIGHLY SKILLED immigrants to USA?�
more...
Legal
07-15 01:51 PM
rockstart
Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 233
dates make no sense
The dates for H4 I 539 renewal are struck at 14th June 2007 where as most of people who filed their renewal's have already got it. These dates are meaningless.
No. That means ALL cases filed before 14th June07 have been processed. You may have filed on July 1st might have been processed, but this has no relevance to the previous statement.
That's why I think all the 485s filed before July 27th 2007 at NSC have undergone some processing, if not completed.
Problem cases, those which may need RFEs may get notified in the coming weeks.
Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 233
dates make no sense
The dates for H4 I 539 renewal are struck at 14th June 2007 where as most of people who filed their renewal's have already got it. These dates are meaningless.
No. That means ALL cases filed before 14th June07 have been processed. You may have filed on July 1st might have been processed, but this has no relevance to the previous statement.
That's why I think all the 485s filed before July 27th 2007 at NSC have undergone some processing, if not completed.
Problem cases, those which may need RFEs may get notified in the coming weeks.
2010 Tomatt omer signed autographs
bigboy007
11-19 04:53 PM
enough is enough on good old Divide and conquer policy... collective we are will achieve something divided we are Definitely we will achieve some thing which is nothing. I support backlog elimination via recapture and removal of per-country limits . PERIOD. No STEM or LEAF or TREE... These are there for distraction..
more...
GCplease
06-07 05:15 PM
Hi,
am e-filing my EAD renewal and I have a couple of questions.
I used Advance Parole to re-enter US. I do not maintain my H1B status. I am on EAD.
Manner of Last Entry - Is it PAR: PAROLEE
Current Immigration Status - Is it PAR: PAROLEE
People who have e-filed in the past, please let me know.
Thanks in Advance.
am e-filing my EAD renewal and I have a couple of questions.
I used Advance Parole to re-enter US. I do not maintain my H1B status. I am on EAD.
Manner of Last Entry - Is it PAR: PAROLEE
Current Immigration Status - Is it PAR: PAROLEE
People who have e-filed in the past, please let me know.
Thanks in Advance.
hair Matthew Bomer is nothing
vjkypally
03-25 12:38 PM
Applied on August 23rd, Still pending, 7 months over for H-1 extension, still not approved and no RFE. This was for a 3 year extension after I-140 approval, I ve finished 7 years on H-1B. Anyone on the same boat? It's really frustrating.....
more...
gsc999
05-27 04:17 PM
House is currently controlled by the Republicans. If they do not pass the bill it would give the perception that the Bush admin. is ineffective. Bush's public rating have nose dived because of Iraq and now but if the bill doesn't pass it will show that he has no support in his own party. His core base is conservative Rep.
Also, it would be better for Republicans to pass the bill with some changes while they still control the house, once Dems gain House majority it may be too late for them to steer the passage of this bill with their amendments. This is a major issue, which I think will push them to pass this bill.
Bush will have to lean hard on some of the House Republicans to make this happen. He has publically commented on his intention of signing the bill by the end of the year.
These issues make me believe that House has to pass a bill. But again, politics is not logical.
Also, it would be better for Republicans to pass the bill with some changes while they still control the house, once Dems gain House majority it may be too late for them to steer the passage of this bill with their amendments. This is a major issue, which I think will push them to pass this bill.
Bush will have to lean hard on some of the House Republicans to make this happen. He has publically commented on his intention of signing the bill by the end of the year.
These issues make me believe that House has to pass a bill. But again, politics is not logical.
hot Aww, Matt Bomer and (I think)
nowhereman
02-01 09:07 AM
I started the US immigration in 2006, PD-September 2006, by CP, EB3ROW. DS230 renewed 3 times since then... a couple of months ago I applied to Canadian PR, now I am waiting for my interview date. So I have two processes parallel - US GC & Canadian PR. My question is : How these two immigrations can jeopardise each other? :confused:
Logicaly I will attend the Canadian interview first, will they ask me about US immigration? should I tell the truth? Will they deny the PR because of the GC process?
Presume that I have successfuly done with canadians and have landed in Canada with my PR in 8-10 months from now, and suddenly, I,ve got an invitation to the GC interview... :eek: Does the fact that I have a Can. PR will kill my future GC and at the interview the will deny and cancell my case? :confused: Or The interview will be successful and I will have my GC, but somewere in the future there is a point where I should refuse one - GC or PR? :confused:
I should mention that the GC is the choise No1 , and PR is a plan "B"...
I believe that my situation is not unique, but now I am out side the US and in my country it is difficult to find a competent lawer. So I hope that somebody from this forum could answer my questions.
Appreciate all useful answers and ancillary information. :):)
chisinau, in my personal experience, applying to US GC is not viewed favourably by Canadian authorities. When we tried to land in Canada, the immigration officer specifically asked us if we had applied for US GC. Also, be sure that you do not insinuate to the Canadian authorities that your first choice is to stay in the US, but make all efforts to show that you will be moving to Canada permanently as soon as your PR is granted. The Canadians do not like granting PR to people who are going to use it as a backup for their GC process.
Logicaly I will attend the Canadian interview first, will they ask me about US immigration? should I tell the truth? Will they deny the PR because of the GC process?
Presume that I have successfuly done with canadians and have landed in Canada with my PR in 8-10 months from now, and suddenly, I,ve got an invitation to the GC interview... :eek: Does the fact that I have a Can. PR will kill my future GC and at the interview the will deny and cancell my case? :confused: Or The interview will be successful and I will have my GC, but somewere in the future there is a point where I should refuse one - GC or PR? :confused:
I should mention that the GC is the choise No1 , and PR is a plan "B"...
I believe that my situation is not unique, but now I am out side the US and in my country it is difficult to find a competent lawer. So I hope that somebody from this forum could answer my questions.
Appreciate all useful answers and ancillary information. :):)
chisinau, in my personal experience, applying to US GC is not viewed favourably by Canadian authorities. When we tried to land in Canada, the immigration officer specifically asked us if we had applied for US GC. Also, be sure that you do not insinuate to the Canadian authorities that your first choice is to stay in the US, but make all efforts to show that you will be moving to Canada permanently as soon as your PR is granted. The Canadians do not like granting PR to people who are going to use it as a backup for their GC process.
more...
house Always sort of a mar matt
eb3India
05-24 07:40 PM
No one is going to help us guys including Bill Gates, he is only interested in getting more H1Bs,
infact our guys does'nt want to help us, there are too many free riders
if you really want to make difference call your senators and contribute to IV
infact our guys does'nt want to help us, there are too many free riders
if you really want to make difference call your senators and contribute to IV
tattoo Matt Bomer: More Hugs
nixstor
04-21 11:13 AM
names with slave in it and with out immigration. How does they make sense to what we are doing here? We are neither slaves nor a social networking website. If you go and search the threads this came up an year ago and it was turned down because of what logiclife explained clearly. I have simply thought that a redirection of URL is enough. Its not true. We need quite a bit of paperwork to be done and it needs some knowledge and experience as well, which is more than suggesting a name change. More over, we have some brand value as IV for some time. Amidst all these highly inflammable bills, name changing can eat away precious time that can be dedicated to imp work.
How about we guys do the 2 things pappu keeps on emphasizing?
1) Meet with lawmakers
2) Contributions and get our friends to contribute.
How about we guys do the 2 things pappu keeps on emphasizing?
1) Meet with lawmakers
2) Contributions and get our friends to contribute.
more...
pictures Why Was Matthew Bomer Wearing
alinaturkova
01-15 11:55 AM
Is it against the law to apply for F-1 visa while I-130 is pending? May it in some way affect the I-130 application?
Since DS-160 form doesn't ask that question regarding petition on my behalf anymore do I have to tell them the truth myself or not unless they ask? Please comment. Thank you.
Since DS-160 form doesn't ask that question regarding petition on my behalf anymore do I have to tell them the truth myself or not unless they ask? Please comment. Thank you.
dresses Matt Bomer
wrldnw4me
05-24 12:21 PM
Fax sent
Thanks for everyone for being part of Immigration voice
Thanks for everyone for being part of Immigration voice
more...
makeup Matt Bomer Actress Beau
gc_maine2
05-15 08:44 AM
apahilaj,
Is yours a paper file or Efile?
Did you send your's & your wife application together (one packet) or separately?
Just a quick update
Today my checks got cashed and from the back of the checks I got the receipt numbers. I was able to track these numbers on USCIS site and the EAD application for myself and my wife is now pending at TSC.
So the mailing address to Mesquite, TX turned out to be the correct location for me to file...
Is yours a paper file or Efile?
Did you send your's & your wife application together (one packet) or separately?
Just a quick update
Today my checks got cashed and from the back of the checks I got the receipt numbers. I was able to track these numbers on USCIS site and the EAD application for myself and my wife is now pending at TSC.
So the mailing address to Mesquite, TX turned out to be the correct location for me to file...
girlfriend Matt Bomer: 48441958
milind70
10-05 02:26 PM
I received IRS tax audit check for year 2005 last week. I guess mostly I can defend my audit and I have scheduled an appointment with IRS tax manager for next week
However god forbid if I have to pay penalty on audit,I was wondering this would impact anything on my 485 process. Does it have any impact
Appreciate your thoughts.
If anyone faced this problem please, please give ur ideas
No relation between these IRS checks and 485 process
However god forbid if I have to pay penalty on audit,I was wondering this would impact anything on my 485 process. Does it have any impact
Appreciate your thoughts.
If anyone faced this problem please, please give ur ideas
No relation between these IRS checks and 485 process
hairstyles Matt Bomer steps out in New
vinzak
11-13 11:37 AM
Jamaica does not require visa for Indian citizens, regardless of US status. One of the very few countries where Indians can go w/o visa along with Thailand and Hong Kong.
vamsi_poondla
02-07 02:52 PM
I never knew that one can become moderator/admin by posting more posts to get attention of Pappu. ;)
There is a thin like between spam and high publicity. Chandu never crossed this.
Those who are yet to send the letters, please send it. Those who already sent them, please ask your friends. Those who feel more strong about GC and believe that IV can work for our benefit, print 10 copies at least and get the signatures from your friends directly.
All in all, let use +ve energy that will make this campaign successful, rather than questioning other motivated members' intentions.
There is a thin like between spam and high publicity. Chandu never crossed this.
Those who are yet to send the letters, please send it. Those who already sent them, please ask your friends. Those who feel more strong about GC and believe that IV can work for our benefit, print 10 copies at least and get the signatures from your friends directly.
All in all, let use +ve energy that will make this campaign successful, rather than questioning other motivated members' intentions.
lonedesi
07-08 07:34 PM
After listening to both the shows, this week as well as last week, I am wondering if it was worth the effort for IV to participate in Debo Kotun's show. Here is my personal comments about the participants and the shows.
Debo Kutan: He did a pathetic job in moderating the shows. He not only spent about 25 minutes talking about his future shows(prior to beginning of today's show), but also repeating the same information from last week and pretty much asking the same questions. He was more interested in talking about his immigration decades ago and how he got his GC in one day, blah blah blah...Also, he mentioned that he was going to get Sen Kennedy & Sen Brownback to participate in today's show..but that was probably some publicity talk to draw more listener's to his show.He repeatedly questioned us to go back to our countries and solve our own problems and as well as theirs rather than trying to understand the root cause of the current situation. He turned out to be very ignorant of the immigration woes and did not seem like he had done any research prior to conducting his shows.
Swadha: She did a good job of explaining her situation and the difficulties she was facing due to the retrogression despite her excellent credentials and qualifications. Thanks to Swadha for her efforts in explaining her current situation due to retrogression.
Carl Shusterman: As popular,qualified and expert he is in the field of immigration, he just turned out to be very ignorant of the ground reality. I was as surprised as Swadha, when he mentioned that people with advanced degrees can get their GC's in a year. Despite having 2 advanced degree's I am still waiting for more than 3 years to be able to apply for I-485. The people most affected by this retrogression are citizens of India and China, not someone from Monaco or Namibia. He was more interested in promoting his Immigration firm and his website. Wish he had been more vocal in explaining the broken immigration system, rather than gaining some publicity for his firm.
Stuart Anderson: He did an excellent job explaining his research studies and how the current immigration laws are affecting the economy and its long term impact, if the immigration system is not rectified soon. Thanks to Stuart for his expert comments and explaining our situation in a wonderful manner.
Rajeev Khanna: He did a good job in the last weeks show, explaining our situation and the broken immigration system. Unfortunately, due to Mr. Kutan's terrible job of moderating, he did not provide much opportunity for Rajeev to speak this week. Thanks to Rajeev for fighting for our cause.
Aman Kapoor: He did a commendable job last week, explaining about IV and its efforts. But due to lack of Mr. Kutans moderating skills, he did not get much time to talk today. Thanks to Aman for organizing and providing an opportunity for IV to discuss about the legal angle of immigration reforms and the difficulties faced by people like us.
Jay Pradhan: Due to technical difficulties, Mr. Kutan could not include him in last week's program, but he did provide him an opportunity this week and explain his case. Jay did an excellent work explaining his situation, current backlogs and also answering some of Mr. Kutan's questions in a very logical manner, like the way only he can do. I wish Mr. Kutan had given more opportunity for Jay to talk and explain the broken immigration system. Excellent job Jay. Hope you get more opportunities like these to discuss about our situation and shed more light to the general public.
Overall, it was some decent publicity for the problems faced by legal immigrant community, though I wonder if it was worth the efforts due to the pathetic job of Mr. Debo Kutan. Hope we can get to participate on more knowledgable/popular talk shows and showcase our problems.
Debo Kutan: He did a pathetic job in moderating the shows. He not only spent about 25 minutes talking about his future shows(prior to beginning of today's show), but also repeating the same information from last week and pretty much asking the same questions. He was more interested in talking about his immigration decades ago and how he got his GC in one day, blah blah blah...Also, he mentioned that he was going to get Sen Kennedy & Sen Brownback to participate in today's show..but that was probably some publicity talk to draw more listener's to his show.He repeatedly questioned us to go back to our countries and solve our own problems and as well as theirs rather than trying to understand the root cause of the current situation. He turned out to be very ignorant of the immigration woes and did not seem like he had done any research prior to conducting his shows.
Swadha: She did a good job of explaining her situation and the difficulties she was facing due to the retrogression despite her excellent credentials and qualifications. Thanks to Swadha for her efforts in explaining her current situation due to retrogression.
Carl Shusterman: As popular,qualified and expert he is in the field of immigration, he just turned out to be very ignorant of the ground reality. I was as surprised as Swadha, when he mentioned that people with advanced degrees can get their GC's in a year. Despite having 2 advanced degree's I am still waiting for more than 3 years to be able to apply for I-485. The people most affected by this retrogression are citizens of India and China, not someone from Monaco or Namibia. He was more interested in promoting his Immigration firm and his website. Wish he had been more vocal in explaining the broken immigration system, rather than gaining some publicity for his firm.
Stuart Anderson: He did an excellent job explaining his research studies and how the current immigration laws are affecting the economy and its long term impact, if the immigration system is not rectified soon. Thanks to Stuart for his expert comments and explaining our situation in a wonderful manner.
Rajeev Khanna: He did a good job in the last weeks show, explaining our situation and the broken immigration system. Unfortunately, due to Mr. Kutan's terrible job of moderating, he did not provide much opportunity for Rajeev to speak this week. Thanks to Rajeev for fighting for our cause.
Aman Kapoor: He did a commendable job last week, explaining about IV and its efforts. But due to lack of Mr. Kutans moderating skills, he did not get much time to talk today. Thanks to Aman for organizing and providing an opportunity for IV to discuss about the legal angle of immigration reforms and the difficulties faced by people like us.
Jay Pradhan: Due to technical difficulties, Mr. Kutan could not include him in last week's program, but he did provide him an opportunity this week and explain his case. Jay did an excellent work explaining his situation, current backlogs and also answering some of Mr. Kutan's questions in a very logical manner, like the way only he can do. I wish Mr. Kutan had given more opportunity for Jay to talk and explain the broken immigration system. Excellent job Jay. Hope you get more opportunities like these to discuss about our situation and shed more light to the general public.
Overall, it was some decent publicity for the problems faced by legal immigrant community, though I wonder if it was worth the efforts due to the pathetic job of Mr. Debo Kutan. Hope we can get to participate on more knowledgable/popular talk shows and showcase our problems.
0 comments:
Post a Comment