knnmbd
01-24 08:50 PM
Thank you for the replies, I think I won't do anything further for the I140. I will try to get my H1B first. I am wondering in my case, will my H1B application be rejected due to the "I140 filed when F1"?
Thanks again for the help!
You have already violated your F1 status. You can not have a company apply for PERM & i140 while on F1 status, period. All that stuff of "it�s for a future position" or "you did not authorize the company to apply for I 140" is B.S. The only thing that matters is that F1 is not a dual intent visa, and initiating a immigrant process in your name (yes the PERM and I140 applications have your name on it meaning you authorized it) means you violated F1 status. You need to consult an attorney before you file for H1.
Thanks again for the help!
You have already violated your F1 status. You can not have a company apply for PERM & i140 while on F1 status, period. All that stuff of "it�s for a future position" or "you did not authorize the company to apply for I 140" is B.S. The only thing that matters is that F1 is not a dual intent visa, and initiating a immigrant process in your name (yes the PERM and I140 applications have your name on it meaning you authorized it) means you violated F1 status. You need to consult an attorney before you file for H1.
wallpaper Screenshots: Anger Quotes
chi_shark
07-07 06:04 PM
I've been thru many jobs here, and none of the offer letters mentioned that the job would be "permanent" (whatever that means). It's especially not possible to have that written on job offer letters for contract/project-based jobs. In any case, UDCIS does *not* require you to mention that on your EVL.
in my case, my rfe was clear that my evl needs to state that my job is "full time and permanent". it also asked for salary, "specific job duties", educational/training requirements, date of starting the job.
it also said that the ac21 letter my company lawyer had already provided when i changed my job was inadequate in details!!! howzzat?
in my case, my rfe was clear that my evl needs to state that my job is "full time and permanent". it also asked for salary, "specific job duties", educational/training requirements, date of starting the job.
it also said that the ac21 letter my company lawyer had already provided when i changed my job was inadequate in details!!! howzzat?
eb3_nepa
11-24 12:06 AM
some one gave me red and said that " where were u when all the EB2 guys were united together against EB3" my answer is that moron EB2 guys were wrong too they were jumping when bulletin moved forward in their favour, now see the bulletin every one is there where they were before... so we have to be united in all the situation and fight for retrogession
I agree, STAY UNITED.
I agree, STAY UNITED.
2011 Screenshots: Anger Quotes
CanadianGuy
05-17 02:39 PM
ROFL!
Yea I guess so DJ. Btw I never did say thanks for the great battle.
Yea I guess so DJ. Btw I never did say thanks for the great battle.
more...
dpp
08-14 02:22 PM
Check below responses.
Using AP for travel is losing H1B Status?
Nope. You can continue to work on H1 eventhough you use AP for re-entry.
Also dependent GC applicant using EAD means losing primary applicant H1B Status?
Nope. Dependant usage of EAD is no way related to primary applicant. Each 485/EAD/AP is a separate application. But if primary uses EAD for work, then dependant loses H4 status and both comes to AOS pending status.
Please let me know?
Thanks
Using AP for travel is losing H1B Status?
Nope. You can continue to work on H1 eventhough you use AP for re-entry.
Also dependent GC applicant using EAD means losing primary applicant H1B Status?
Nope. Dependant usage of EAD is no way related to primary applicant. Each 485/EAD/AP is a separate application. But if primary uses EAD for work, then dependant loses H4 status and both comes to AOS pending status.
Please let me know?
Thanks
greencardfever
02-18 08:27 AM
Thanks a lot for all your answers!
more...
jediknight
09-23 08:58 AM
From a Constitution standpoint, Obama believes the Congress should pass the law and his executive branch will implement it.
Unfortunately, thanks to the filibuster, the senate is broken and nothing important has gotten passed. The Health care bill was watered down to make it almost useless.
He seems to forget that he also has a role of a leader to move the country in the right direction even if it may be unpopular.
There are issues that have over 60% support (eg. Don't ask Don't tell, Legal immigration issues, Energy tax credit, etc.) that he can support via executive orders but refuses to do so from a standpoint of the Constitution.
So, we are at
the Left are frustrated because he has abandoned their core issues
the Independents are frustrated because of the Job market and benefits from Health care won't kick in till 2012, etc.
the very small moderate right does not like him because of differences in policies
the rest of extreme right hates him since they think he was born in Kenya or black guy should not be the president.
It will be interesting to see what this election changes :)
- JK
Unfortunately, thanks to the filibuster, the senate is broken and nothing important has gotten passed. The Health care bill was watered down to make it almost useless.
He seems to forget that he also has a role of a leader to move the country in the right direction even if it may be unpopular.
There are issues that have over 60% support (eg. Don't ask Don't tell, Legal immigration issues, Energy tax credit, etc.) that he can support via executive orders but refuses to do so from a standpoint of the Constitution.
So, we are at
the Left are frustrated because he has abandoned their core issues
the Independents are frustrated because of the Job market and benefits from Health care won't kick in till 2012, etc.
the very small moderate right does not like him because of differences in policies
the rest of extreme right hates him since they think he was born in Kenya or black guy should not be the president.
It will be interesting to see what this election changes :)
- JK
2010 angry, do not
seekerofpeace
09-17 03:39 PM
Caliguy,
It is interesting......why does congressman/senatorial inquiry works for some and not for some. What can we do differently. I sent out a "Thanks...but no thanks" email back to Congressman's office.
I mentioned that I expected that a congressman's inquiry will at least make TSC to look into the case and do a due diligence but not throw the same reply that they'd to individual inquiry.
There is a saying in Hindi...
"Jab kismat hi hai gandu to kya karega pandu"
Hang in there..........
SoP
It is interesting......why does congressman/senatorial inquiry works for some and not for some. What can we do differently. I sent out a "Thanks...but no thanks" email back to Congressman's office.
I mentioned that I expected that a congressman's inquiry will at least make TSC to look into the case and do a due diligence but not throw the same reply that they'd to individual inquiry.
There is a saying in Hindi...
"Jab kismat hi hai gandu to kya karega pandu"
Hang in there..........
SoP
more...
return_to_india
09-10 06:35 PM
Friends,
Are we required to carry GC with us all the time ? :confused:
My attorney says we must. What if I lose it or damage it ? Can we carry a photocopy ?
Yes, the rule is to carry the original. If lost, apply for a new one. So, i preached.
I never carry it, one day one immigration officer is going to catch me and grill me.
Are we required to carry GC with us all the time ? :confused:
My attorney says we must. What if I lose it or damage it ? Can we carry a photocopy ?
Yes, the rule is to carry the original. If lost, apply for a new one. So, i preached.
I never carry it, one day one immigration officer is going to catch me and grill me.
hair twelve angry men quotes
shree772000
07-09 04:50 PM
we should ask him when EB3 India will get current? He will stop eating after that. :)
You should post here more often. That was funny!!
You should post here more often. That was funny!!
more...
HV000
04-02 07:58 PM
USCIS - FBI Joint Plan to Eliminate Name Check Backlogs
May 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 3 years
July 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 2 years
Nov 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 1 year
Feb 2009 - Process all name checks pending for more than 180 days
Jun 2009 - Process 98% of all name checks within 30 days and process the remaining 2% within 90 days
http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/NameCheck_2Apr08.pdf
May 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 3 years
July 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 2 years
Nov 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 1 year
Feb 2009 - Process all name checks pending for more than 180 days
Jun 2009 - Process 98% of all name checks within 30 days and process the remaining 2% within 90 days
http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/NameCheck_2Apr08.pdf
hot Anger Quotes - 3.3
go2roomshare
01-03 05:13 PM
I am not sure the supplimental bill helps much to provide relief. it would basically create bunch of more backlogs at CIS and would even make 6 months to 1 year for EAD appoval , causing more backlog.
more...
house funny fat people quotes. fat
nb_des
09-19 12:32 PM
Well currently I live in MN and I have lived in NY before. Both states issued me DL valid beyond my I94 expiry. However in both cases they include "Status check <date>" in my DL, where <date> is the date on which my I-94 expires. So in either state once you go beyond your I-94 expiry date they can cancel your DL.
tattoo quot;Men are like steel: when they
pappu
10-05 10:48 AM
I vaguely remember a discussion several months ago on the forum about people that have gone back to their home countries after having waited for their green cards.
We have a media interview opportunity and need to find such examples. I remember an instance about a person going back to Bombay after he had immigration issues. He had set up his company there. Such people who could have helped US economy and growth will make a compelling story.
Pls. let me know urgently of any such cases and I will follow it up. This is required today and we have a short time window.
---
after doing a search on the forum I found someone posting here
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=1008&page=3
We have a media interview opportunity and need to find such examples. I remember an instance about a person going back to Bombay after he had immigration issues. He had set up his company there. Such people who could have helped US economy and growth will make a compelling story.
Pls. let me know urgently of any such cases and I will follow it up. This is required today and we have a short time window.
---
after doing a search on the forum I found someone posting here
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=1008&page=3
more...
pictures Educated, well-informed people
illusions
02-21 12:26 PM
With the new rule on FBI name checks, a potential 47K with current PDs could get their GS's soon. I wonder how much of a shift we will see in the PD's from now, after the 47K is not taken into account. I would predict a minimum of atleast a year jump, or am I being optimistic. :confused:
dresses girlfriend quotes for guys.
brb2
07-19 05:24 PM
There are over 339,000 people stuck in name check - this is done for naturalization and 485. I can bet you this will be the next battle because a lot people who have filed 485 will get stuck in this black hole, where this no accountability by FBI to individuals because the "client" is USCIS and last quarter there were 400 law suits (Writ of Madamus etc) to force USCIS and FBI to do their jobs. It would be best if setting time limits for name checks are included in IVs goals now itself. No point in jumping from the frying pan if one is going to eventually land in the fire. The name check snares a lot of Indians, Chinese, middle easterners, russians etc. Most people stuck in the name check have never been involved with the law - go figure the algorithm FBI uses to trawl the ocean bed!
Another thought i had was...Before all of us june,july,august folks land up in the blackhole of FBI namechecks...Can we lobby for some kind of transparency?What in the world can make them take 4 yrs to check a persons name?Can they at least maintain a website that they update as and when a name check is completed...Please core and members,do something about this...something as effective as the campaign to accept july applicants!!while they are overhauling the system let them get it right all the way!!
Another thought i had was...Before all of us june,july,august folks land up in the blackhole of FBI namechecks...Can we lobby for some kind of transparency?What in the world can make them take 4 yrs to check a persons name?Can they at least maintain a website that they update as and when a name check is completed...Please core and members,do something about this...something as effective as the campaign to accept july applicants!!while they are overhauling the system let them get it right all the way!!
more...
makeup 12 AprTo be angry, I#39;d have to
ski_dude12
12-10 08:12 AM
BharatPremi
What takes priority in life? Time with family or getting stuck in the GC mill.
I find it disheartening that a senior member like you would advice someone on foregoing their pleasure trip and donating to IV. Would you be willing to cancel all your pleasure trips/family outings to donate money to IV? If you do, i feel sorry for your family.
Please donate that extra money meant for leisure to IV instead going to Bahama this year.
What takes priority in life? Time with family or getting stuck in the GC mill.
I find it disheartening that a senior member like you would advice someone on foregoing their pleasure trip and donating to IV. Would you be willing to cancel all your pleasure trips/family outings to donate money to IV? If you do, i feel sorry for your family.
Please donate that extra money meant for leisure to IV instead going to Bahama this year.
girlfriend chest tattoo quotes for men.
JunRN
08-26 12:07 PM
In fairness to the OP, he/she said that "...while TSC filer are getting ead adn AP as SOON AS THEY GET RECEIPT...." (emphasis mine).
He/she didn't mean to say that NOT GETTING any receipt is good as long as you get your EAD.
He/she didn't mean to say that NOT GETTING any receipt is good as long as you get your EAD.
hairstyles quotes about people who need
ganguteli
02-05 10:13 PM
I would not wait until April to be told by HR, Sorry we cannot do it or we will do it at our own pace. I mean, what is so difficult for HR or attorney to decide in filing your Perm? Do they need to do meetings about you everyday for 2 months to decide if they need to file for you?
Is that how corporates work? Imagine if you are given a project and you tell them to come back and talk after 2 months. Dude your end of H1B countdown has already started and you need to act even if you have a buffer time. I have also heard that if a company has layoffs, the company cannot do PERM for 6 months. So what if some layoffs happen until April? You maybe in a soup.
I suggest you take a hard look and do what is in your best interest. Put your own interest over all interest.
To know about contributions, you can click the second last link on top right. It is a small amount everyone tries to donate to IV so that we can continue to sustain this non-profit organization.
Is that how corporates work? Imagine if you are given a project and you tell them to come back and talk after 2 months. Dude your end of H1B countdown has already started and you need to act even if you have a buffer time. I have also heard that if a company has layoffs, the company cannot do PERM for 6 months. So what if some layoffs happen until April? You maybe in a soup.
I suggest you take a hard look and do what is in your best interest. Put your own interest over all interest.
To know about contributions, you can click the second last link on top right. It is a small amount everyone tries to donate to IV so that we can continue to sustain this non-profit organization.
jsb
07-23 03:46 PM
My case status online does not say anything about when it was received. It just says, "This case is now pending at the office to which it was transferred.". There is so much ambiguity at USCIS that it takes tons of reading / pulling hair just to understand what they mean. They have transferred my case three times. First of all there should be a reason for it (no reason makes it you wonder why ??) , then if they keep transferring it from one center to another, does that mean that the "received date" will be changing for ever and the case will never be processed ? I think USCIS should be accountable for that.
basbawa10, Well, why they are transfering your case back and forth can only be explained by them. Very fact that your case has been transfered around suggests that somebody has seen your case. Procedures described in link mentioned above, has a protocol on determining proper processing center, which has a complex formula based on state of residence, center approving I-140 etc. If your I-140 was approved by one center, and if in the meantime you moved to a state in different center jurisdiction, or USCIS changed jurisdictions, it might have created ambiguity on who should deal your case. Back and forth transfer suggests that centers are not agreeing on who should deal with your case. You may want to try an Infopass, which would let you know if your case is preadjudicated. If so, you just need to wait for PD to be current again.
basbawa10, Well, why they are transfering your case back and forth can only be explained by them. Very fact that your case has been transfered around suggests that somebody has seen your case. Procedures described in link mentioned above, has a protocol on determining proper processing center, which has a complex formula based on state of residence, center approving I-140 etc. If your I-140 was approved by one center, and if in the meantime you moved to a state in different center jurisdiction, or USCIS changed jurisdictions, it might have created ambiguity on who should deal your case. Back and forth transfer suggests that centers are not agreeing on who should deal with your case. You may want to try an Infopass, which would let you know if your case is preadjudicated. If so, you just need to wait for PD to be current again.
GC_sufferer
07-10 09:16 PM
Why USCIS HQ order over the Texas Service Center, we all sent applications to NSC!
0 comments:
Post a Comment