singhsa3
04-27 05:13 PM
One of the blogger named Jhaalaa, posted on 17 Apr 2008 on
Lesson for all e-filers:
1. Try to say you do NOT intend to provide supporting documents for a I-765 for a pending I-485 application (If you have provided I-485 case number and correct Alien number already).
2. Immediately after the e-filing send the supporting documents (well arranged and tabbed in order of significance) with a copy of the e-file receipt. Unless you provide this, the case would NOT progress. I even talked to an IO who stated that I should not send any documents till requested, but its my experience that you should send the documents immediately after the e-filing.
Lesson for all e-filers:
1. Try to say you do NOT intend to provide supporting documents for a I-765 for a pending I-485 application (If you have provided I-485 case number and correct Alien number already).
2. Immediately after the e-filing send the supporting documents (well arranged and tabbed in order of significance) with a copy of the e-file receipt. Unless you provide this, the case would NOT progress. I even talked to an IO who stated that I should not send any documents till requested, but its my experience that you should send the documents immediately after the e-filing.
wallpaper Well if Mary Murphy and Adam
GCOP
09-11 01:35 PM
You too did a good Job. You also earned a Green.
[QUOTE=DesiGuy;287839]found this excellent details and thought should share it. :)
Have also highlighted #6 where HR 5882 is currently at
http://www.vote-smart.org/resource_govt101_02.php
GOVERNMENT 101: How a Bill Becomes Law
A.
Legislation is Introduced - Any member can introduce a piece of legislation
House - Legislation is handed to the clerk of the House or placed in the hopper.
[QUOTE=DesiGuy;287839]found this excellent details and thought should share it. :)
Have also highlighted #6 where HR 5882 is currently at
http://www.vote-smart.org/resource_govt101_02.php
GOVERNMENT 101: How a Bill Becomes Law
A.
Legislation is Introduced - Any member can introduce a piece of legislation
House - Legislation is handed to the clerk of the House or placed in the hopper.
loudoggs
08-14 06:13 PM
krishnam70:
I just saw your signature and it seems like you just received your GC. Congrats!!!
I am sure you feel relieved.
I just saw your signature and it seems like you just received your GC. Congrats!!!
I am sure you feel relieved.
2011 Mary Murphy, actress who played opposite Brando in #39;Wild One,#39; dies at 80
sudhakar_p_v
05-28 05:51 PM
Wanted to see if there is a provision to call the lockbox facility or uscis to enquire on the status of the application.
i am worried since i have not seen any activity on this for about a 4 weeks now.
please advise.
i am worried since i have not seen any activity on this for about a 4 weeks now.
please advise.
more...
CT_Green
01-23 07:23 PM
"Representative Elton Gallegly (R-CA) introduced H.R. 133, Citizenship Reform Act of 2007, which would limit citizenship by birth to children born to at least one permanent resident or citizen parent."
Does this mean that if we do not have green cards our childern born here are not citizens. Am I understanding it right..
This requires a change in the constitution and I do not think it will ever pass.
Does this mean that if we do not have green cards our childern born here are not citizens. Am I understanding it right..
This requires a change in the constitution and I do not think it will ever pass.
desi3933
06-25 03:30 PM
I double checked with my attorney , either or AP or EAD usage will change your status, ie H1 is no more valid.
http://www.immigrationportal.com/archive/index.php/t-215457.html
http://www.immigrationportal.com/archive/index.php/t-215457.html
more...
I_need_GC
07-11 10:28 AM
You are way more qualified than me. I only have 2 masters, research work, research papers. My attorney was able to get my EB1 approved without sponsorship. You will definitely get EB1
2010 upgrades mary murphy
pappu
01-27 01:02 PM
I agree. This is a good idea.
In these tough times we will allow people to create threads in this section to post their qualifications and also to post if they have any leads.
Let us try to help each other.
We have also started a social networking groups called 'IV Job networking' http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/group.php?groupid=1
You can also use that area to make friends.
Send me a PM if you have any ideas how we can improve our site to accommodate this need of our members.
In these tough times we will allow people to create threads in this section to post their qualifications and also to post if they have any leads.
Let us try to help each other.
We have also started a social networking groups called 'IV Job networking' http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/group.php?groupid=1
You can also use that area to make friends.
Send me a PM if you have any ideas how we can improve our site to accommodate this need of our members.
more...
learning01
05-26 01:26 PM
We have limited time and we have to achieve a lot. Our time and efforts should be utilized in a much better way, don't you agree? I appreciate your posting of your links. And what is your point? Include as a small comment or note at the top. It is easy for any one to 'google' conference, immigration and bill to come up with a few thousand good and relevant link. If I post a good number of them, one would definitely be lost.
Posting links should serve a purpose here. The primary purpose is achieving IV goals. A smaller purpose could be to see what the other side is saying, but my suggestion is to ignore them in general.
I went to both the links; one of the I understand is a Libertarian organization and the other radical left. As anyone can see, they don't represent the views of mainstream America. So, it is a waste of time and effort and above all a distraction here. That's my advice.
check these :
Posting links should serve a purpose here. The primary purpose is achieving IV goals. A smaller purpose could be to see what the other side is saying, but my suggestion is to ignore them in general.
I went to both the links; one of the I understand is a Libertarian organization and the other radical left. As anyone can see, they don't represent the views of mainstream America. So, it is a waste of time and effort and above all a distraction here. That's my advice.
check these :
hair MARY MURPHY
bomber
07-03 11:34 AM
Guys,
The AILA article may not be sufficient to explain how exactly we've been hurt. I've added a few more lines in the end and emailed to some of these addresses:
A======
Losses suffered by my family and tens of thousands of others:
1) Cost of medical exams and having to take vaccinations
2) Attorney fees
3) Cost of getting paperwork expedited from home countris
4) Cost of time off from work to prepare the applications
5) Postage/Fedex
6) People canceling their non-refundable tickets for summer travel so they could be in this country
7) People having to spend a lot of extra money to fly their families back.
8) People having to change their marriage plans and having to pay for cancellations of a lot of events.
6) Emotional trauma our families had to go through. A spouse who is forced to sit at home for many years was shown a hope for being able to work and that hope being shattered
MY BIG QUESTION IS :
Could the federal government have been able to get away with something like this if it had affected 100 US Citizens? NO!
In this case, it harmed, financially and emotionally devastated atleast 150-200 thousand FAMILIES, but those were of Legal hi-tech foreign workers....Who cares about them !
The AILA article may not be sufficient to explain how exactly we've been hurt. I've added a few more lines in the end and emailed to some of these addresses:
A======
Losses suffered by my family and tens of thousands of others:
1) Cost of medical exams and having to take vaccinations
2) Attorney fees
3) Cost of getting paperwork expedited from home countris
4) Cost of time off from work to prepare the applications
5) Postage/Fedex
6) People canceling their non-refundable tickets for summer travel so they could be in this country
7) People having to spend a lot of extra money to fly their families back.
8) People having to change their marriage plans and having to pay for cancellations of a lot of events.
6) Emotional trauma our families had to go through. A spouse who is forced to sit at home for many years was shown a hope for being able to work and that hope being shattered
MY BIG QUESTION IS :
Could the federal government have been able to get away with something like this if it had affected 100 US Citizens? NO!
In this case, it harmed, financially and emotionally devastated atleast 150-200 thousand FAMILIES, but those were of Legal hi-tech foreign workers....Who cares about them !
more...
amitjoey
05-22 06:21 PM
Please use this:
We have been model "future citizens" by paying all our taxes, abiding by civic laws and meticulously making sure that we never get out of our precarious H-1 B visa status. This is how we are rewarded. This isn't a "grand bargain" it is not even an "amnesty" as many anti-immigrants are labeling it, this is worse, it is a "travesty." Bravo US Senate, you just proved that playing by the rules is such an unAmerican trait. We learn that from your grand bargain. Better late than never. So being illegal, not paying taxes will yeild you a green-card after 8 years of z-visa. How about many of us that have been subjected to endless waits, thousands of dollars in USCIS Fees, paying taxes for the last 8 or more years. Do we have to wait for another 8-10 years?. With the "grand-bargain" it does seem like it will be more years for legals waiting in line.
I like to think that being illegal is better than legal as per the provisions in CIR!
What do you think of H4-spouses who can't work whereas those illegal can now apply for a work-visas!
What do you think of parents who were not issued visitor visas for silly reasons? Whereas those who by hook or crook got here are being given work-visas?
How come the illegals are guaranteed a GC within 5 years and the current legal immigrants are NOT?
How come the illegals can work and the legal residents on certain visas can't?
How come the illegals can work for any employer while H1Bs can't?
I am not against giving these benefits to illegals if that's how it needs to fixed. But what about us, the bright and good folks!!
When did h1b become a joke?
This grand-compromise is not making sense at all. It's smelling real bad for legal-visa holders.
I would like to hear from you folks..
We have been model "future citizens" by paying all our taxes, abiding by civic laws and meticulously making sure that we never get out of our precarious H-1 B visa status. This is how we are rewarded. This isn't a "grand bargain" it is not even an "amnesty" as many anti-immigrants are labeling it, this is worse, it is a "travesty." Bravo US Senate, you just proved that playing by the rules is such an unAmerican trait. We learn that from your grand bargain. Better late than never. So being illegal, not paying taxes will yeild you a green-card after 8 years of z-visa. How about many of us that have been subjected to endless waits, thousands of dollars in USCIS Fees, paying taxes for the last 8 or more years. Do we have to wait for another 8-10 years?. With the "grand-bargain" it does seem like it will be more years for legals waiting in line.
I like to think that being illegal is better than legal as per the provisions in CIR!
What do you think of H4-spouses who can't work whereas those illegal can now apply for a work-visas!
What do you think of parents who were not issued visitor visas for silly reasons? Whereas those who by hook or crook got here are being given work-visas?
How come the illegals are guaranteed a GC within 5 years and the current legal immigrants are NOT?
How come the illegals can work and the legal residents on certain visas can't?
How come the illegals can work for any employer while H1Bs can't?
I am not against giving these benefits to illegals if that's how it needs to fixed. But what about us, the bright and good folks!!
When did h1b become a joke?
This grand-compromise is not making sense at all. It's smelling real bad for legal-visa holders.
I would like to hear from you folks..
hot Mary Murphy, 1955 publicity
chanduv23
02-07 02:14 PM
I think we need to be careful these kind of conversations aren't detrimental to the current campaign and to IV. I am new here, but I do also feel the drive that chanduv23 has and you know, sometimes you do feel like posting it everywhere and on your forehead. This backlog situation sometimes gets the better of us! I am all for organizing too, we need that. But I do sympathize with those who feel desperate to reach as many visitors as possible. There are still folk out there who would like to send their letter, let's encourage them and still be organized. I promise to keep my posts to threads already existing from now on. Thanks :)
Nothing wrong in posting threads that help support a cause. My question to all those who are attacking me - why are we fighting among ourselves? Why can we not work towards the goal?
Please keep up the good work - you are doing a great job.
Nothing wrong in posting threads that help support a cause. My question to all those who are attacking me - why are we fighting among ourselves? Why can we not work towards the goal?
Please keep up the good work - you are doing a great job.
more...
house Best Supporting Actress:
sixburgh
08-04 09:04 AM
Congrats for the painless Visa stamping.
If you are on EAD before leaving US, you better to continue the same status. Their might be a situation for USCIS considering giving up your AOS, if you enter US on H1b while you were on EAD before leaving US.
Are you saying that
I should use my AP to enter the USA and not the H1?
And then ofcourse I will have to continue using EAD.
OR are you saying?
I should enter on H1, but use EAD ?
Wont that invalidate my H1 stamp for any future use?
Secondly, Arent the h1 and l1 visa holders allowed to have dual intent?
Why would they reject my 485, just because I used an H1 to re-enter?
I have seen posts on this site where people have entered back on H1 despite 485 pending.
Can someone clarify and help on my situation ?
If you are on EAD before leaving US, you better to continue the same status. Their might be a situation for USCIS considering giving up your AOS, if you enter US on H1b while you were on EAD before leaving US.
Are you saying that
I should use my AP to enter the USA and not the H1?
And then ofcourse I will have to continue using EAD.
OR are you saying?
I should enter on H1, but use EAD ?
Wont that invalidate my H1 stamp for any future use?
Secondly, Arent the h1 and l1 visa holders allowed to have dual intent?
Why would they reject my 485, just because I used an H1 to re-enter?
I have seen posts on this site where people have entered back on H1 despite 485 pending.
Can someone clarify and help on my situation ?
tattoo MM Mary Murphy laughing
samcam
05-24 12:55 PM
done...
more...
pictures Mary Murphy will be
pitha
02-14 06:58 PM
Last time around exactly the same time in 2006 CIR took off like crazy because of the tremendous backing of Senate Judiciary committee chairman Arlen Specter and Senate majority Leader Bill Frist (who actually gave a deadline for a the bill to be introduced to the senate floor, to speed it up) and president bush supporting it as well. In spite of all these it took the senate from Feb-march 2006 to around September 2006 to get it passed.
Now to the present situation, Harry Reid, the current majority leader never ever publicly spoke one good word about CIR, the present senate judiciary committee chairman, Patrick J. Leahy has not displayed even 1/100 the urgency nor the interest in CIR that Arlon Specter displayed, president Bush though still supporting CIR is a wounded president licking his wounds and has truly become a lame duck president (most unfortunately for us).
Having considered the above facts what are the chances of CIR happening? Its very painful to say that but I think very low. Even by a miracle (a very big miracle at that) if something happens it will be November or December 2007 before it passes.
As if this not painful enough there is a 60 day waiting period from the day the president signs it before it becomes a law. I think there is some confusion on this 60 day period (I am not 100% sure on this). In addition to it if I remember correctly there was a strange condition which was something like there would be a 6 month investigation period to determine the effects of CIR before becoming a law. If you add all this nonsense up I think in the best case scenario January or February 2008 before CIR becomes law and worst case scenario July or August 2008 to become a law. just my 2 cents. I can only pray and hope I am wrong.
Bills almost never go to the floor directly. Especially something as huge as CIR. It will go thru committee again and it will go thru normal rounds of debate and amendments between the 18 people in Judiciary committee.
Its very unusual for a bill to hit the floor directly without going thru the committee that has jurisdiction over it. If it happens all the time, then the committees would be meaningless. The whole point of having a committee is to be able to either kill the entire bill, or a congressional appointment before such a bill / confirmation is debated by all 100 senators. Same thing in the House.
If it was possible to bypass committees, then people would have floored the SKIL or other bills directly on the floor of the house, therby bypassing Jim Sensenbrenner and his Judiciary committee last year.
Now to the present situation, Harry Reid, the current majority leader never ever publicly spoke one good word about CIR, the present senate judiciary committee chairman, Patrick J. Leahy has not displayed even 1/100 the urgency nor the interest in CIR that Arlon Specter displayed, president Bush though still supporting CIR is a wounded president licking his wounds and has truly become a lame duck president (most unfortunately for us).
Having considered the above facts what are the chances of CIR happening? Its very painful to say that but I think very low. Even by a miracle (a very big miracle at that) if something happens it will be November or December 2007 before it passes.
As if this not painful enough there is a 60 day waiting period from the day the president signs it before it becomes a law. I think there is some confusion on this 60 day period (I am not 100% sure on this). In addition to it if I remember correctly there was a strange condition which was something like there would be a 6 month investigation period to determine the effects of CIR before becoming a law. If you add all this nonsense up I think in the best case scenario January or February 2008 before CIR becomes law and worst case scenario July or August 2008 to become a law. just my 2 cents. I can only pray and hope I am wrong.
Bills almost never go to the floor directly. Especially something as huge as CIR. It will go thru committee again and it will go thru normal rounds of debate and amendments between the 18 people in Judiciary committee.
Its very unusual for a bill to hit the floor directly without going thru the committee that has jurisdiction over it. If it happens all the time, then the committees would be meaningless. The whole point of having a committee is to be able to either kill the entire bill, or a congressional appointment before such a bill / confirmation is debated by all 100 senators. Same thing in the House.
If it was possible to bypass committees, then people would have floored the SKIL or other bills directly on the floor of the house, therby bypassing Jim Sensenbrenner and his Judiciary committee last year.
dresses Mary Murphy (Popperfoto/Getty
Thombi
07-11 10:26 PM
I was not implying that legal immigrants would abuse the information if they received someone else's documents, but with that many rejected applications in the mail and lying in mailboxes, there is always a possibility of theft by others. Also documents like the medical exams are expensive to replace.
more...
makeup The late actress and singer
bugsbunny
03-30 11:52 AM
if you are on EAD and they pay you...you will have to declare it on your taxes...so you will have to pay upwards of 33% tax on it...which is far far more than the 4% charge currently
girlfriend Mary Murphy, a film and
bestoption
08-04 09:27 PM
H1B is a fallback in case I485 is denied. Kumar - you may need to check with your attorneys or an independant attorney on immigration law.
hairstyles Sable and Mary Murphy for
WeShallOvercome
09-21 12:20 PM
EAD card production email for my wife received yesterday 9/20.
I did not apply for EAD for myself.
I'm a 'NSC only' case
EB2, India PD : 12/2003
I-485, EAD/AP RD :7/2/2007
I did not apply for EAD for myself.
I'm a 'NSC only' case
EB2, India PD : 12/2003
I-485, EAD/AP RD :7/2/2007
slowwin
03-03 02:25 PM
how do i create a new thread ?
polapragada
10-14 01:09 PM
2 months movement for for EB2-I to June 2003. EB3-I 3 months.
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html
India
E1 Current
E2 1 June 2003
E3 1 October 2001
Let us hope dates move forward in December.
Now a days INDIA is faster than US;)
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html
India
E1 Current
E2 1 June 2003
E3 1 October 2001
Let us hope dates move forward in December.
Now a days INDIA is faster than US;)
0 comments:
Post a Comment